General Population to Membership Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c65ed/c65edccb167eba2fa7af32a9e2cb938ead41e814" alt=""
The second graphic in the Pre-Conference Journal aims at the heart of the problem we're facing. The population of out part of the state continues to rise - and we're not keeping up. The graph included in the report might lead one to believe we're doing ok.
A careless reader would look at 1980 and see a big gap between membership and population and then look at 2004 and see a much smaller gap. How many people will notice that the scale for each line is quite different - one (the Population) varying by 1,000,000, the other (Membership) by 10,000? Is our general math literacy better than has been reported?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72d09/72d096c8fee5e3806915ce7b7af11c20f0db07fa" alt=""
Let's look at the same numbers differently. This figure graphs the percentage of the population reflected in the membership of the church. I believe this depicts the decline much more clearly.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home